|
Alabama State Lemon Law
California Civil Code §1793.2
S1793.22. Conformity of Motor
Vehicles to Express Warranties; Dispute Resolution; Disclosure of
Nonconformity Upon Subsequent Transfer.
(a) This
section shall be known and may be cited as the Tanner
Consumer Protection Act.
(b) It
shall be presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have been
made to conform a new motor vehicle to the applicable express
warranties if, within 18 months from delivery to the buyer or 18,000
miles on the odometer of the vehicle, whichever occurs first, either
(1) the same nonconformity has been subject to repair four or more
times by the manufacturer or its agents and the buyer has at least
once directly notified the manufacturer of the need for the repair
of the nonconformity or (2) the vehicle is out of service by reason
of repair of nonconformities by the manufacturer or its agents for a
cumulative total of more than 30 calendar days since delivery of the
vehicle to the buyer. The 30-day limit shall be extended only if
repairs cannot be performed due to conditions beyond the control of
the manufacturer or its agents. The buyer shall be required to
directly notify the manufacturer pursuant to paragraph (1) only if
the manufacturer has clearly and conspicuously disclosed to the
buyer, with the warranty or the owner's manual, the provisions of
this section and that of subdivision (d) of Section 1793.2,
including the requirement that the buyer must notify the
manufacturer directly pursuant to paragraph (1). This presumption
shall be a rebuttable presumption affecting the burden of proof, and
it may be asserted by the buyer in any civil action, including an
action in small claims court, or other formal or informal
proceeding.
(c) If a
qualified third-party dispute resolution process exists, and the
buyer receives timely notification in writing of the availability of
that qualified third-party dispute resolution process with a
description of its operation and effect, the presumption in
subdivision (b) may not be asserted by the buyer until after the
buyer has initially resorted to the qualified third-party dispute
resolution process as required in subdivision (d). Notification of
the availability of the qualified third-party dispute resolution
process is not timely if the buyer suffers any prejudice resulting
from any delay in giving the notification. If a qualified
third-party dispute resolution process does not exist, or if the
buyer is dissatisfied with that third-party decision, or if the
manufacturer or its agent neglects to promptly fulfill the terms of
the qualified third-party dispute resolution process decision after
the decision is accepted by the buyer, the buyer may assert the
presumption provided in subdivision (b) in an action to enforce the
buyer's rights under subdivision (d) of Section 1793.2. The findings
and decision of a qualified third-party dispute resolution process
shall be admissible in evidence in the action without further
foundation. Any period of limitation of actions under any federal or
California laws with respect to any person shall be extended for a
period equal to the number of days between the date a complaint is
filed with a third-party dispute resolution process and the date of
its decision or the date before which the manufacturer or its agent
is required by the decision to fulfill its terms if the decision is
accepted by the buyer, whichever occurs later.
(d) A
qualified third-party dispute resolution process shall be one that
does all of the following:
(1)
Complies with the minimum requirements of the Federal Trade
Commission for informal dispute settlement procedures as set forth
in Part 703 of Title 16 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as those
regulations read on January 1, 1987.
(2) Renders
decisions which are binding on the manufacturer if the buyer elects
to accept the decision.
(3)
Prescribes a reasonable time, not to exceed 30 days after the
decision is accepted by the buyer, within which the manufacturer or
its agent must fulfill the terms of its decisions.
(4)
Provides arbitrators who are assigned to decide disputes with copies
of, and instruction in, the provisions of the Federal Trade
Commission's regulations in Part 703 of Title 16 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as those regulations read on January 1, 1987,
Division 2 (commencing with Section 2101) of the Commercial Code,
and this chapter.
(5)
Requires the manufacturer, when the process orders, under the terms
of this chapter, either that the nonconforming motor vehicle be
replaced if the buyer consents to this remedy or that restitution be
made to the buyer, to replace the motor vehicle or make restitution
in accordance with paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section
1793.2.
(6)
Provides, at the request of the arbitrator or a majority of the
arbitration panel, for an inspection and written report on the
condition of a nonconforming motor vehicle, at no cost to the buyer,
by an automobile expert who is independent of the manufacturer.
(7) Takes
into account, in rendering decisions, all legal and equitable
factors, including, but not limited to, the written warranty, the
rights and remedies conferred in regulations of the Federal Trade
Commission contained in Part 703 of Title 16 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as those regulations read on January 1, 1987, Division 2
(commencing with Section 2101) of the Commercial Code, this chapter,
and any other equitable considerations appropriate in the
circumstances. Nothing in this chapter requires that, to be
certified as a qualified third-party dispute resolution process
pursuant to this section, decisions of the process must consider or
provide remedies in the form of awards of punitive damages or
multiple damages, under subdivision (c) of Section 1794, or of
attorneys' fees under subdivision (d) of Section 1794, or of
consequential damages other than as provided in subdivisions (a) and
(b) of Section 1794, including, but not limited to, reasonable
repair, towing, and rental car costs actually incurred by the buyer.
(8)
Requires that no arbitrator deciding a dispute may be a party to the
dispute and that no other person, including an employee, agent, or
dealer for the manufacturer, may be allowed to participate
substantively in the merits of any dispute with the arbitrator
unless the buyer is allowed to participate also. Nothing in this
subdivision prohibits any member of an arbitration board from
deciding a dispute.
(9) Obtains
and maintains certification by the Department of Consumer Affairs
pursuant to Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 472) of Division 1 of
the Business and Professions Code.
(e) For the
purposes of subdivision (d) of Section 1793.2 and this section, the
following terms have the following meanings:
(1)
Nonconformity means a nonconformity which substantially
impairs the use, value, or safety of the new motor vehicle to the
buyer or lessee.
(2)
New motor vehicle means a new motor vehicle which is used
or bought for use primarily for personal, family, or household
purposes. "New motor vehicle" also means a new motor vehicle that is
bought or used for business and personal, family, or hosehold
purposes by a person, including a aprtnership, limited liability
company, corporation, association, or any other legal entity,
towhich not more than five motor vehicles are registered in this
state. ''New motor vehicle'' includes the chassis, chassis cab, and
that portion of a motor home devoted to its propulsion, but does not
include any portion designed, used, or maintained primarily for
human habitation, a dealer-owned vehicle and a ''''demonstrator'' or
other motor vehicle sold with a manufacturer's new car warranty but
does not include a motorcycle or a motor vehicle which is not
registered under the Vehicle Code because it is to be operated or
used exclusively off the highways. A ''''demonstrator'' is a vehicle
assigned by a dealer for the purpose of demonstrating qualities and
characteristics common to vehicles of the same or similar model and
type.
(3)
"Motor home" means a vehicular unit built on, or
permanently attached to, a self-propelled motor vehicle chassis,
chassis cab, or van, which becomes an integral part of the completed
vehicle, designed for human habitation for recreational or emergency
occupancy.
(f) (1)
Except as provided in paragraph (2), no person shall sell, either at
wholesale or retail, lease, or transfer a motor vehicle transferred
by a buyer or lessee to a manufacturer pursuant to paragraph (2) of
subdivision (d) of Section 1793.2 or a similar statute of any other
state, unless the nature of the nonconformity experienced by the
original buyer or lessee is clearly and conspicuously disclosed to
the prospective buyer, lessee, or transferee, the nonconformity is
corrected, and the manufacturer warrants to the new buyer, lessee,
or transferee in writing for a period of one year that the motor
vehicle is free of that nonconformity.
(2) Except
for the requirement that the nature of the nonconformity be
disclosed to the transferee, paragraph (1) does not apply to the
transfer of a motor vehicle to an educational institution if the
purpose of the transfer is to make the motor vehicle available for
use in automotive repair courses. Leg.H. 1992 ch. 1232 S7.
S1793.23.
Automotive Consumer Notification Act; ''Lemon
Law Buyback.''
(a) The
Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(1) That
the expansion of state warranty laws covering new and used cars has
given important and valuable protection to consumers.
(2) That,
in states without this valuable warranty protection, used and
irrepairable motor vehicles are being resold in the marketplace
without notice to the subsequent purchaser.
(3) That
other states have addressed this problem by requiring notices on the
title of these vehicles or other notice procedures to warn consumers
that the motor vehicles were repurchased by a dealer or manufacturer
because the vehicle could not be repaired in a reasonable length of
time or a reasonable number of repair attempts or the dealer or
manufacturer was not willing to repair the vehicle.
(4) That
these notices serve the interests of consumers who have a right to
information relevant to their buying decisions.
(5) That
the disappearance of these notices upon the transfer of title from
another state to this state encourages the transport of ''''lemons''
to this state for sale to the drivers of this state.
(b) This
section and Section 1793.24 shall be known, and may be cited as, the
Automotive Consumer Notification Act.
(c) Any
manufacturer who reacquires or assists a dealer or lienholder to
reacquire a motor vehicle registered in this state, any other state,
or a federally administered district shall, prior to any sale,
lease, or transfer of the vehicle in this state, or prior to
exporting the vehicle to another state for sale, lease, or transfer
if the vehicle was registered in this state and reacquired pursuant
to the provisions of subdivision (d) of Section 1793.2, cause the
vehicle to be retitled in the name of the manufacturer, request the
Department of Motor Vehicles to inscribe the ownership certificate
with the notation ''''Lemon Law Buyback,'' and affix a decal to the
vehicle in accordance with Section 11713.12 of the Vehicle Code if
the manufacturer knew or should have known that the vehicle is
required by law to be replaced, accepted for restitution due to the
failure of the manufacturer to conform the vehicle to applicable
warranties pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 1793.2, or
accepted for restitution by the manufacturer due to the failure of
the manufacturer to conform the vehicle to warranties required by
any other applicable law of the state, any other state, or federal
law.
(d) Any
manufacturer who reacquires or assists a dealer or lienholder to
reacquire a motor vehicle in response to a request by the buyer or
lessee that the vehicle be either replaced or accepted for
restitution because the vehicle did not conform to express
warranties shall, prior to the sale, lease, or other transfer of the
vehicle, execute and deliver to the subsequent transferee a notice
and obtain the transferee's written acknowledgment of a notice, as
prescribed by Section 1793.24.
(e) Any
person, including any dealer, who acquires a motor vehicle for
resale and knows or should have known that the vehicle was
reacquired by the vehicle's manufacturer in response to a request by
the last retail owner or lessee of the vehicle that it be replaced
or accepted for restitution because the vehicle did not conform to
express warranties shall, prior to the sale, lease, or other
transfer, execute and deliver to the subsequent transferee a notice
and obtain the transferee's written acknowledgment of a notice, as
prescribed by Section 1793.24.
(f) Any
person, including any manufacturer or dealer, who sells, leases, or
transfers ownership of a motor vehicle when the vehicle's ownership
certificate is inscribed with the notation ''''Lemon Law Buyback''
shall, prior to the sale, lease, or ownership transfer of the
vehicle, provide the transferee with a disclosure statement signed
by the transferee that states:
''''THIS
VEHICLE WAS REPURCHASED BY ITS MANUFACTURER DUE TO A DEFECT IN THE
VEHICLE PURSUANT TO CONSUMER WARRANTY LAWS. THE TITLE TO THIS
VEHICLE HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY BRANDED WITH THE NOTATION ''LEMON LAW
BUYBACK'.''
(g) The
disclosure requirements in subdivisions (d), (e), and (f) are
cumulative with all other consumer notice requirements and do not
relieve any person, including any dealer or manufacturer, from
complying with any other applicable law, including any requirement
of subdivision (f) of Section 1793.22.
(h) For
purposes of this section, ''''dealer'' means any person engaged in
the business of selling, offering for sale, or negotiating the
retail sale of, a used motor vehicle or selling motor vehicles as a
broker or agent for another, including the officers, agents, and
employees of the person and any combination or association of
dealers. Leg.H. 1995 ch. 503.
1995 Note:
This act shall apply only to vehicles reacquired by a manufacturer
on or after January 1, 1996, and shall not affect any proceeding
relating to vehicles reacquired prior to January 1, 1996. Stats.
1995 ch. 503 S7. |