|
Minnesota State Lemon Law
Minnesota Statutes
Annotated, 325 F.665
325F.665
New motor
vehicle warranties; manufacturer's duty to repair, refund, or
replace.
Subdivision
1
Definitions.
For the
purposes of this section, the following terms have the meanings
given them:
(a)
"consumer" means the purchaser or lessee, other than for purposes of
resale or sublease, of a new motor vehicle used for personal,
family, or household purposes at least 40 percent of the time, a
person to whom the new motor vehicle is transferred for the same
purposes during the duration of an express warranty applicable to
the motor vehicle;
(b)
"manufacturer" means a person engaged in the business of
manufacturing, assembling or distributing motor vehicles, who will,
under normal business conditions during the year, manufacture,
assemble or distribute to dealers at least ten new motor vehicles;
(c)
"manufacturer's express warranty" and "warranty" mean the written
warranty of the manufacturer of a new motor vehicle of its condition
and fitness for use, including any terms or conditions precedent to
the enforcement of obligations under that warranty;
(d)
"lease" means a contract in the form of a lease or bailment for the
use of personal property by a natural person for a period of time
exceeding four months, used for personal, family, or household
purposes at least 40 percent of the time, whether or not the lessee
has the option to purchase or otherwise become the owner of the
property at the expiration of the lease;
(e)
"motor vehicle" means
(1)
a passenger automobile as defined in section 168.011, subdivision 7,
including pickup trucks and vans, and
(2)
the self-propelled motor vehicle chassis or van portion of
recreational equipment as defined in section 168.011, subdivision
25, which is sold or leased to a consumer in this state;
(f)
"informal dispute settlement mechanism" means an arbitration process
or procedure by which the manufacturer attempts to resolve disputes
with consumers regarding motor vehicle nonconformities and repairs
that arise during the vehicle's warranty period;
(g)
"motor vehicle lessor" means a person who holds title to a motor
vehicle leased to a lessee under a written lease agreement or who
holds the lessor's rights under such agreement; and
(h)
"early termination costs" means expenses and obligations incurred by
a motor vehicle lessor as a result of an early termination of a
written lease agreement and surrender of a motor vehicle to a
manufacturer under subdivision 4, including penalties for prepayment
of finance arrangements.
Subdivision
2
Manufacturer's duty to repair.
If a new motor
vehicle does not conform to all applicable express warranties, and
the consumer reports the nonconformity to the manufacturer, its
agent, or its authorized dealer during the term of the applicable
express warranties or during the period of two years following the
date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to a consumer,
whichever is the earlier date, the manufacturer, its agent, or its
authorized dealer shall make the repairs necessary to conform the
vehicle to the applicable express warranties, notwithstanding the
fact that the repairs are made after the expiration of the warranty
term or the two-year period.
Subdivision
3
Manufacturer's duty to refund or replace.
(a)
If the manufacturer, its agents, or its authorized dealers are
unable to conform the new motor vehicle to any applicable express
warranty by repairing or correcting any defect or condition which
substantially impairs the use or market value of the motor vehicle
to the consumer after a reasonable number of attempts, the
manufacturer shall either replace the new motor vehicle with a
comparable motor vehicle or accept return of the vehicle from the
consumer and refund to the consumer the full purchase price,
including the cost of any options or other modifications arranged,
installed, or made by the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized
dealer within 30 days after the date of original delivery, and all
other charges including, but not limited to, sales or excise tax,
license fees and registration fees, reimbursement for towing and
rental vehicle expenses incurred by the consumer as a result of the
vehicle being out of service for warranty repair, less a reasonable
allowance for the consumer's use of the vehicle not exceeding ten
cents per mile driven or ten percent of the purchase price,
whichever is less. If the manufacturer offers a replacement vehicle
under this section, the consumer has the option of rejecting the
replacement vehicle and requiring the manufacturer to provide a
refund. Refunds must be made to the consumer, and lien holder, if
any, as their interests appear on the records of the registrar of
motor vehicles. Refunds shall include the amount stated by the
dealer as the trade-in value of a consumer's used motor vehicle,
plus any additional amount paid by the consumer for the new motor
vehicle. A manufacturer must give to the consumer an itemized
statement listing each of the amounts refunded under this section.
If the amount of sales or excise tax refunded is not separately
stated, or if the manufacturer does not apply for a refund of the
tax within one year of the return of the motor vehicle, the
department of public safety may refund the tax, as determined under
paragraph (h), directly to the consumer and lien holder, if any, as
their interests appear on the records of the registrar of motor
vehicles. A reasonable allowance for use is that amount directly
attributable to use by the consumer and any previous consumer during
any period in which the use and market value of the motor vehicle
are not substantially impaired. It is an affirmative defense to any
claim under this section
(1)
that an alleged nonconformity does not substantially impair the use
or market value, or
(2)
that a nonconformity is the result of abuse, neglect, or
unauthorized modifications or alterations of a motor vehicle by
anyone other than the manufacturer, its agent or its authorized
dealer.
(b)
It is presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have been
undertaken to conform a new motor vehicle to the applicable express
warranties, if
(1)
the same nonconformity has been subject to repair four or more times
by the manufacturer, its agents, or its authorized dealers within
the applicable express warranty term or during the period of two
years following the date of original delivery of the new motor
vehicle to a consumer, whichever is the earlier date, but the
nonconformity continues to exist, or
(2)
the vehicle is out of service by reason of repair for a cumulative
total of 30 or more business days during the term or during the
period, whichever is the earlier date.
(c)
If the nonconformity results in a complete failure of the braking or
steering system of the new motor vehicle and is likely to cause
death or serious bodily injury if the vehicle is driven, it is
presumed that a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken
to conform the vehicle to the applicable express warranties if the
nonconformity has been subject to repair at least once by the
manufacturer, its agents, or its authorized dealers within the
applicable express warranty term or during the period of two years
following the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to
a consumer, whichever is the earlier date, and the nonconformity
continues to exist.
(d)
The term of an applicable express warranty, the two-year period and
the 30-day period shall be extended by any period of time during
which repair services are not available to the consumer because of a
war, invasion, strike, or fire, flood, or other natural disaster.
(e)
The presumption contained in paragraph (b) applies against a
manufacturer only if the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized
dealer has received prior written notification from or on behalf of
the consumer at least once and an opportunity to cure the defect
alleged. If the notification is received by the manufacturer's agent
or authorized dealer, the agent or dealer must forward it to the
manufacturer by certified mail, return receipt requested.
(f)
The expiration of the time periods set forth in paragraph (b) does
not bar a consumer from receiving a refund or replacement vehicle
under paragraph (a) if the reasonable number of attempts to correct
the nonconformity causing the substantial impairment occur within
three years following the date of original delivery of the new motor
vehicle to a consumer, provided the consumer first reported the
nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized
dealer during the term of the applicable express warranty.
(g)
At the time of purchase or lease, the manufacturer must provide
directly to the consumer a written statement on a separate piece of
paper, in 10-point all capital type, in substantially the following
form:
"IMPORTANT: IF
THIS VEHICLE IS DEFECTIVE, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED UNDER THE STATE'S
LEMON LAW TO REPLACEMENT OF IT OR A REFUND OF ITS PURCHASE PRICE OR
YOUR LEASE PAYMENTS. HOWEVER, TO BE ENTITLED TO REFUND OR
REPLACEMENT, YOU MUST FIRST NOTIFY THE MANUFACTURER, ITS AGENT, OR
ITS AUTHORIZED DEALER OF THE PROBLEM IN WRITING AND GIVE THEM AN
OPPORTUNITY TO REPAIR THE VEHICLE. YOU ALSO HAVE A RIGHT TO SUBMIT
YOUR CASE TO THE CONSUMER ARBITRATION PROGRAM WHICH THE MANUFACTURER
MUST OFFER IN MINNESOTA."
(h)
The amount of the sales or excise tax to be paid by the manufacturer
to the consumer under paragraph (a) shall be the tax paid by the
consumer when the vehicle was purchased less an amount equal to the
tax paid multiplied by a fraction, the denominator of which is the
purchase price of the vehicle and the numerator of which is the
allowance deducted from the refund for the consumer's use of the
vehicle.
Subdivision
4
Manufacturer's duty to consumers with leased vehicles.
A consumer who
leases a new motor vehicle has the same rights against the
manufacturer under this section as a consumer who purchases a new
motor vehicle, except that, if it is determined that the
manufacturer must accept return of the consumer's leased vehicle
pursuant to subdivision 3, then the consumer lessee is not entitled
to a replacement vehicle, but is entitled only to a refund as
provided in this subdivision. In such a case, the consumer's leased
vehicle shall be returned to the manufacturer and the consumer's
written lease with the motor vehicle lessor must be terminated. The
manufacturer shall then provide the consumer with a full refund of
the amount actually paid by the consumer on the written lease,
including all additional charges set forth in subdivision 3, if
actually paid by the consumer, less a reasonable allowance for use
by the consumer as set forth in subdivision 3. The manufacturer
shall provide the motor vehicle lessor with a full refund of the
vehicle's original purchase price plus any early termination costs,
not to exceed 15 percent of the vehicle's original purchase price,
less the amount actually paid by the consumer on the written lease.
Subdivision
5
Resale or
re-lease of returned motor vehicle.
(a)
If a motor vehicle has been returned under the provisions of
subdivision 3 or a similar statute of another state, whether as the
result of a legal action or as the result of an informal dispute
settlement proceeding, it may not be resold or re-leased in this
state unless:
(1)
the manufacturer provides the same express warranty it provided to
the original purchaser, except that the term of the warranty need
only last for 12,000 miles or 12 months after the date of resale,
whichever is earlier; and
(2)
the manufacturer provides the consumer with a written statement on a
separate piece of paper, in 10-point all capital type, in
substantially the following form:
"IMPORTANT:
THIS VEHICLE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER BECAUSE IT DID NOT
CONFORM TO THE MANUFACTURER'S EXPRESS WARRANTY AND THE NONCONFORMITY
WAS NOT CURED WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME AS PROVIDED BY MINNESOTA
LAW."
The provisions
of this section apply to the resold or re-leased motor vehicle for
full term of the warranty required under this subdivision.
(b)
Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a), if a new motor
vehicle has been returned under the provisions of subdivision 3 or a
similar statute of another state because of a nonconformity
resulting in a complete failure of the braking or steering system of
the motor vehicle likely to cause death or serious bodily injury if
the vehicle was driven, the motor vehicle may not be resold in this
state.
Subdivision
6
Alternative
dispute settlement mechanism.
(a)
Any manufacturer doing business in this state, entering into
franchise agreements for the sale of its motor vehicles in this
state, or offering express warranties on its motor vehicles sold or
distributed for sale in this state shall operate, or participate in,
an informal dispute settlement mechanism located in the state of
Minnesota which complies with the provisions of the Code of Federal
Regulations, title 16, part 703, and the requirements of this
section. The provisions of subdivision 3 concerning refunds or
replacement do not apply to a consumer who has not first used this
mechanism before commencing a civil action, unless the manufacturer
allows a consumer to commence an action without first using this
mechanism.
(b)
An informal dispute settlement mechanism provided for by this
section shall, at the time a request for arbitration is made,
provide to the consumer and to each person who will arbitrate the
consumer's dispute, information about this section as approved and
directed by the attorney general, in consultation with interested
parties. The informal dispute settlement mechanism shall permit the
parties to present or submit any arguments based on this section and
shall not prohibit or discourage the consideration of any such
arguments.
(c)
If, in an informal dispute settlement mechanism, it is decided that
a consumer is entitled to a replacement vehicle or refund under
subdivision 3, then any refund or replacement offered by the
manufacturer or selected by a consumer shall include and itemize all
amounts authorized by subdivision 3. If the amount of excise tax
refunded is not separately stated, or if the manufacturer does not
apply for a refund of the tax within one year of the return of the
motor vehicle, the department of public safety may refund the excise
tax, as determined under subdivision 3, paragraph (h), directly to
the consumer and lien holder, if any, as their interests appear on
the records of the registrar of motor vehicles.
(d)
No documents shall be received by any informal dispute settlement
mechanism unless those documents have been provided to each of the
parties in the dispute at or prior to the mechanism's meeting, with
an opportunity for the parties to comment on the documents either in
writing or orally. If a consumer is present during the informal
dispute settlement mechanism's meeting, the consumer may request
postponement of the mechanism's meeting to allow sufficient time to
review any documents presented at the time of the meeting which had
not been presented to the consumer prior to the meeting.
(e)
The informal dispute settlement mechanism shall allow each party to
appear and make an oral presentation in the state of Minnesota
unless the consumer agrees to submit the dispute for decision on the
basis of documents alone or by telephone, or unless the party fails
to appear for an oral presentation after reasonable prior written
notice. If the consumer agrees to submit the dispute for decision on
the basis of documents alone, then manufacturer or dealer
representatives may not participate in the discussion or decision of
the dispute.
(f)
Consumers shall be given an adequate opportunity to contest a
manufacturer's assertion that a nonconformity falls within intended
specifications for the vehicle by having the basis of the
manufacturer's claim appraised by a technical expert selected and
paid for by the consumer prior to the informal dispute settlement
hearing.
(g)
Where there has been a recent attempt by the manufacturer to repair
a consumer's vehicle, but no response has yet been received by the
informal dispute mechanism from the consumer as to whether the
repairs were successfully completed, the parties must be given the
opportunity to present any additional information regarding the
manufacturer's recent repair attempt before any final decision is
rendered by the informal dispute settlement mechanism. This
provision shall not prejudice a consumer's rights under this
section.
(h)
If the manufacturer knows that a technical service bulletin directly
applies to the specific mechanical problem being disputed by the
consumer, then the manufacturer shall provide the technical service
bulletin to the consumer at reasonable cost. The mechanism shall
review any such technical service bulletins submitted by either
party.
(i)
A consumer may be charged a fee to participate in an informal
dispute settlement mechanism required by this section, but the fee
may not exceed the conciliation court filing fee in the county where
the arbitration is conducted.
(j)
Any party to the dispute has the right to be represented by an
attorney in an informal dispute settlement mechanism.
(k)
The informal dispute settlement mechanism has all the
evidence-gathering powers granted an arbitrator under section
572.14.
(l)
A decision issued in an informal dispute settlement mechanism
required by this section may be in writing and signed.
Subdivision
7
Effect and
admissibility of decision by informal dispute settlement mechanism.
The decision
issued in an informal dispute settlement mechanism required by this
section is non-binding on the parties involved, unless otherwise
agreed by the parties. Any party, upon application, may remove the
decision to district court for a trial de novo. If the manufacturer
is aggrieved by the decision of the informal dispute settlement
mechanism, an application to remove the decision must be filed in
the district court within 30 days after the date the decision is
received by the parties. If the application to remove is not made
within 30 days, then the district court shall, upon application of a
party, issue an order confirming the decision. A written decision
issued by an informal dispute settlement mechanism, and any written
findings upon which the decision is based, are admissible as
non-binding evidence in any subsequent legal action and are not
subject to further foundation requirements.
Subdivision
8
Treble
damages for bad faith appeal of decision.
If the district
court finds that a party has removed a decision of an informal
dispute settlement mechanism in bad faith, by asserting a claim or
defense that is frivolous and costly to the other party, or by
asserting an unfounded position solely to delay recovery by the
other party, then the court shall award to the prevailing party
three times the actual damages sustained, together with costs and
disbursements, including reasonable attorney's fees.
Subdivision
9
Civil
remedy.
Any consumer
injured by a violation of this section may bring a civil action to
enforce this section and recover costs and disbursements, including
reasonable attorney's fees incurred in the civil action. In addition
to the remedies provided herein, the attorney general may bring an
action pursuant to section 8.31 against any manufacturer for
violation of this section.
Subdivision
10
Limitation
on actions.
A civil action
brought under this section must be commenced within three years of
the date of original delivery of the new motor vehicle to a
consumer; except that, if the consumer applies to an informal
dispute settlement mechanism within three years of the date of
original delivery of a new motor vehicle to a consumer, and if the
consumer is aggrieved by the decision of the informal dispute
settlement mechanism, then any civil action brought under this
section must be commenced within six months after the date of the
final decision by the mechanism.
Subdivision
11
Remedy
nonexclusive.
Nothing in this
section limits the rights or remedies which are otherwise available
to a consumer under any other law.
Subdivision
12
Disclosure
requirement.
In addition to
any investigative powers authorized by law, the attorney general may
inspect the records of the informal dispute settlement mechanism
upon reasonable notice, during regular business hours, and may make
available to the public information about the operation of the
mechanism, but data on an individual may not be disclosed without
the prior consent of the individual.
Subdivision
13
Dealer
liability.
Nothing in this
section imposes liability on a dealer or creates an additional cause
of action by a consumer against a dealer, except for written express
warranties made by the dealer apart from the manufacturer's
warranties. The manufacturer shall not charge back or require
reimbursement by the dealer for any costs, including, but not
limited to, any refunds or vehicle replacements, incurred by the
manufacturer arising out of this section, unless there is evidence
that the related repairs had not been carried out by the dealer in a
timely manner or in a manner substantially consistent with the
manufacturer's published
instructions.
|